( 35 ) Statement showing admissions from cholera among the European and Native Troops and Jail Populations in the Bengal Province, together with the strength of the Troops and jails in the Province during each year of the series from 1854, to 1868 inclusive, and the annual rate of admissions per mille of strength. YEARS. EUROPEAN TROOPS NATIVE TROOPS JAIL POPULATIONS TOTAL Strength. Cholera cases. Strength. Cholera cases. Strength. Cholera cases. Strength. Cholera cases. Rate per mille of Strength 1854 12,925 110 18,554 467 31,479 577 18.3 1855 12,496 211 16,870 882 29,266 1,013 34.6 1856 3,596 156 14,828 150 16,738 792 35,162 1,098 31.2 1857 ? 156* ..... ...... 15,930 739 ? 895 56.2 1858 5,985 320 .... ..... 17,218 711 23,203 1,031 44.4 1859 8,908 290 8,038 97 16,351 686 33,297 1,073 32.2 1860 7,102 329 7,767 137 15,111 1,393 29,980 1,839 62.0 1861 5,890 56 4,420 63 14,939 588 25,249 707 28.0 1862 4,451 24 4,603 41 15,364 367 24,418 432 17.7 1863 4,111 18 6,510 55 13,382 1,072 24,003 1,145 47.7 1864 4,308 20 8,207 89 15,496 652 28,011 761 27.2 1865 4,450 23 9,488 307 16,023 415 29,961 745 24.9 1866 4,381 28 ? 9,500 93 18,780 1,415 32,661 1,536 47.0 1867 4,162 7 5,650 65 16,945 363 26,757 435 16.2 1868 3,824 17 7,476 36 16,278 289 27,578 342 12.4 * This number represents the deaths of the year, the number of admissions being unknown. The presidency hospitals and troops marching-the strengths of which are not known-are not included in the above statement. The death-rate for 1857 is calculated on the jail returns alone. The above statement shows that during the four successive triennial periods, from 1857 to 1868 inclusive, the cholera of Bengal in its general incidence among the troops and jail populations of the province, has observed a very remarkable regularity of rise and fall within each triennial period. In the first year of each triennial period the disease has prevailed with epidemic violence, during the second it has somewhat abated, and during the third it has sub- sided to the minimum prevalance of the three-years period, or to the ordinary cholera prevalence of the province. Thus the epidemic years of the series are 1857, 1860, 1863, and 1866; the ordinary years of the series are 1859, 1862, 1865, and 1868; the intermediate or abating years of cholera of the series are 1858, 1861, 1864, and 1867. The figures for the first triennial period of the series, 1854 to 1856 inclusive, do not show the same regularity; this is probably to a certain extent due to the absence of the returns for the European troops during the first two years of the triennial period; but it is to be observed on the other hand that the jail returns taken alone for this three-year period yielded similar anomalous results. Thus the ratio per mille of strength of the jail populations in the whole province is 25.2, 47.5, and 47.3 for the years 1854, 1855, and 1856 respectively; combined with the returns of the native troops for the first two years of the triennial period they yield the rates of 18.3 and 34.6 for 1854 and 1855 respectively, and in the third year of the period, combined with the returns for the European troops also they yieled the rate of 31.2. Probably the returns for the European troops during 1854 and 1855, were they available, would in a measure restore the regularity of cholera prevalence in this three-year period and assmilate the results to the ratios yielded by the succeeding triennial periods of the whole series. As the figures stand, however, we find that in four out of the five succes- sive triennal periods comprised between the years 1854 and 1868 inclusive, there is a remarkable regularity in the rise and fall of cholera activity, and the regularity is so uniform as to preclude the idea of accidental coincidence. It would be interesting and important also to ascertain to what extent, if to any, this regularity in the periodical or cyclical rise and fall of cholera activity in the Bengal Province is connected with the annual rainfall. But most unfortunately no data are available to show the characteristics of these triennial periods in this respect. That there is a real connection between the annual rainfall and the prevalence of cholera in Bengal, as in the other provinces of India, there is no reason to doubt. On the contrary, general obser- vation and popular opinion both strongly incline to the reality of a fixed and determinate relation between the rainfall and cholera activity; but owing to the absence of records, it is at present impossible to show what this relation is F 2