12 REPORT OF THE INDIAN HEMP DRUGS COMMISSION, 1893-94. [CH. I.
representative a nature
as possible, and that all classes interested should be ade-
quately represented. But, as has already been explained, the action
of the Local
Governments and Administrations was in almost all cases
supplemented by the
Commission, who held themselves free to invite the evidence of
persons or asso-
ciations whose acquaintance with the subject was brought to their
notice, or
who seemed on any ground to be able to throw any light on the
subject.
Witnesses of the third
class were of course not selected, but were invited in
the most public way, as has been already explained, to come forward
and lay
their views before the Commission, should they desire to do
so.
The following table shows
the number of witnesses in each province whose
evidence was received by the Commission:—
Witnesses in British Provinces whose evidence was received by the Commission.
OFFICIAL. |
NON-OFFICIAL. |
||||||||||||||
Province. |
CIVIL |
MEDICAL |
PRIVATE |
Zamindars and Planters, etc. |
Persons engaged in trade. |
||||||||||
TIONERS. |
|||||||||||||||
Superior. |
Subordinate. |
Superior. |
Subordinate. |
Practising after
Eu- |
Practising after |
Professional men. |
Missionaries. |
Associations. |
Others.. |
Total. |
|||||
Bengal |
44 |
55 |
21 |
11 |
12 |
15 |
40 |
22 |
5 |
9 |
6 |
11 |
251 |
||
Assam |
17 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
48 |
|||
N.-W. P. and Oudh |
44 |
29 |
21 |
25 |
6 |
52 |
45 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
17 |
17 |
264 |
||
Punjab |
18 |
13 |
6 |
8 |
2 |
7 |
12 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
7 |
95 |
||
Central Provinces |
16 |
18 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
21 |
4 |
3 |
12 |
84 |
|||||
Madras |
42 |
36 |
17 |
20 |
1 |
6 |
13 |
9 |
17 |
2 |
15 |
15 |
193 |
||
Bombay |
30 |
32 |
13 |
14 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
118 |
||
Sind |
4 |
10 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
35 |
||||
Berar |
6 |
11 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
36 |
||||||
Ajmere-Merwara. |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
||||||||
Coorg |
2 |
2 |
|||||||||||||
Baluchistan |
1 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
|||||||||||
Burma |
34 |
2 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
53 |
||||||||
Total |
257 |
210 |
112 |
102 |
34 |
87 |
144 |
55 |
34 |
24 |
75 |
59 |
1,193 |
This list comprises all
the persons and associations in British provinces
whose evidence came before the Commission, whether they were
examined orally
or not, and whether they were specially summoned or invited to give
evidence or
volunteered their evidence. A nominal list of the witnesses in each
province