VITAMIN-A IN THE LIVERS OF SOME FARM ANIMALS                          133

                                                 TABLE II

               Relation between concentration of the liver and the blue units

Weight in
mg. of
original
liver

Rabbit A

Rabbit B

Rabbit C

Tinto-
metric
blue
readings
(Lovibond)

Blue
units

Tinto-
metric
readings

Blue
units

Tinto-
metric
readings

Blue
units

50 . .

3.2

160

2.6

130

3.7

185

100 . .

6.0

150

4.8

120

6.2

155

200 . .

9.3

116

8.8

110

11.6

145

300 . .

11.3

95

10.8

90

13.5

113

400 . .

12.8

80

12.2

76

14.9

93

500 . .

14.2

71

13.3

66

16.3

82

                                                 TABLE III

               Relation between concentration of the liver and the blue units

Specimen

Weight in
mg. of original
liver

Tintometric
readings

Blue units

Healthy Bull . . . . .

10

2.0

500

20

3.5

438

30

4.5

375

40

5.8

362

50

7.2

360

100

11.0

275

200

13.8

173

300

16.0

133

400

17.6

110

Goat affected with rinderpest . .

20

4.7

591

40

7.2

450

60

9.4

390

80

11.2

350

100

13.3

333

It will be observed that in none of these cases is the relation between the con-
centration of liver and the tintometric readings linear, although the unsaponifiable
fraction has been used in the test. [Compare Norris and Church, 1930]. For
obvious reasons, tests could not be carried out at very low dilutions. Our results
are in general agreement with those available in the literature. [Cf. Chakravorty,
Mukherjee and Guha, 1933 ; Datta and Banerjee, 1934, on fish oils]. From these