324 THE INDIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY SCIENCE AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY [VI, IV
fed by hand. The temperature of the birds was recorded twice daily. Details
of these birds are given in Table I. The following is the abstract of the same :—
Serial |
Fowl |
Interval |
Date of injecting |
Date of |
Date of |
Interval |
|
Trypanblue |
Virus |
||||||
1 |
Cock . . |
One week. |
19th Jan., |
26th Jan., |
6th |
11 days. |
|
2 |
Hen . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
30th |
4 „ |
||
3 |
Hen . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
31st |
5 „ |
||
4 |
Hen . . |
Do. . |
Nil . |
26th Jan.. |
2nd |
7 „ |
|
5 |
Hen . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
7th |
III and |
|
6 |
Hen . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
4th |
9 days. |
|
7 |
Hen . . |
24 hours. |
25th Jan., |
26th Jan., |
29th |
3 |
|
8 |
Cook . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
30th |
4 „ |
||
9 |
Hen . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
31st |
5 ., |
||
10 |
Hen . . |
Do. . |
Nil . |
26th Jan., |
2nd |
7 „ |
|
11 |
Cock . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
4th |
9 „ |
|
12 |
Cock . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
4th |
9 „ |
|
13 |
Cock . . |
Simulta- |
26th Jan., |
26th Jan., |
29th |
3 „ |
|
14 |
Cock . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
30th |
4 „ |
||
15 |
Cockrel . |
27th Jan., |
Nil . |
27th Jan., |
2nd |
7 „ |
|
16 |
Cockrel . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
7th |
III and |
|
17 |
Pullet . . |
Controls . |
Nil . |
26th Jan., |
31st |
5 days. |
|
18 |
Pullet . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
29th |
3 „ |
||
19 |
Pullet . . |
Do. . |
26th Jan., |
2nd |
7 „ |
||
20 |
Pullet . . |
Do. . |
Do. . |
31st |
5 |
All fowls got affected with the disease and died within twelve days except
two which too were ill and were, therefore, destroyed to wind up the experiment
in order to enable me to attend to urgent duties awaiting elsewhere. These
results show that trypanblue failed to protect the birds when they were infected
artificially or exposed to heavy infection under artificial conditions.
Prophylactic value of Trypanblue under field conditions
Experiment 2.—This experiment was carried out at Kedgaon, a village in
Poona District. The disease had broken out there on 20th December 1935 and
had inflicted a heavy loss to the village as more than 300 fowls had died. The
experiment was undertaken on the fowls which were located in one street where
the statistics were 88 attacks, 87 deaths and one " still affected ". Two hundred